Over 2,000 NASA Employees Set to Be Let Go as Trump Administration Pushes Forward With Deep Cuts

In what could be one of the most damaging shakeups in recent NASA history, over 2,000 agency employees are reportedly being forced out as part of the Trump administration’s latest cost-cutting initiative. This move has sparked concern across the scientific community and is already drawing comparisons to previous controversial budget slashes under Trump’s earlier term.

According to newly obtained internal documents, 2,145 NASA employees are slated to leave the agency through a mix of early retirements, voluntary buyouts, and deferred resignations. What’s particularly troubling is that many of those being let go are in senior-level government positions, meaning the agency could lose not just staff, but also decades of experience and leadership.

Of the employees affected, 1,818 work directly in core mission areas such as planetary science, astrophysics, Earth observation, and human spaceflight. The remaining personnel are in mission support roles like IT and administrative services.

The scale and focus of the cuts have raised major alarms across scientific organizations and advocacy groups. This isn’t the first time the Trump administration has targeted NASA with sweeping budget cuts.

Earlier proposals have already triggered widespread concern, particularly the administration’s 2026 budget plan, which would cancel dozens of key science programs and slash funding across critical research initiatives.

According to newly obtained internal documents, 2,145 NASA employees are slated to leave the agency

                                                                                     Pexels

                                                                           [ADVERTISEMENT]

The impact could be catastrophic. In March, The Planetary Society issued a strong warning when rumors of significant cuts began to surface. They predicted exactly this scenario — and called it out as a threat to NASA’s future.

Posting on Twitter, they wrote:

“This would be nothing short of an extinction level event for NASA’s science and exploration, losing that much money, that fast, would force NASA to make so many terrible decisions.”

The nonprofit also launched a letter-writing campaign, encouraging supporters to contact the White House and protest the rumored cuts.

                                                                            [ADVERTISEMENT]

In a tweet summarizing the potential fallout, The Planetary Society warned:

“You like missions to Venus? Too bad, they’re gone. What about missions to Mars? Deep space? The sun? Earth? Anywhere? Active missions that are producing science right now? Too bad. Those are probably gone too.”

This growing concern is not just coming from outside advocacy groups. Seven former leaders of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate came together last week to issue a joint letter condemning the White House’s proposed 47 percent cut to NASA’s science budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

They cautioned that such dramatic reductions could have lasting consequences — not only for NASA’s momentum but for the United States’ position as a global leader in space.

Their letter reads:

“The economics of these proposed cuts ignore a fundamental truth: investments in NASA science have been and are a powerful driver of the U.S. economy and technological leadership.”

The former NASA officials pointed to the agency’s history of groundbreaking innovation, writing:

“In our former roles leading NASA’s space science enterprise, we consistently saw skilled teams innovate in the face of seemingly impossible goals, including landing a car-sized rover on Mars with pinpoint precision, build a massive telescope that can unfold in the vacuum of space to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos, design and operate a spacecraft hardy enough to survive temperatures of many thousands of degrees at the Sun, inspiring young and old alike worldwide by the stunning images from the Hubble Space Telescope, and pioneering the use of small satellites for science.”

They argue that gutting the science budget will not only eliminate current and future missions but also risk undermining generations of scientific progress and the very infrastructure that makes American space innovation possible.

With these cuts looming, the fear is not just about what will be lost in the short term, but what will never be developed at all — a chilling prospect in an era when global competition in space exploration is accelerating. China, in particular, continues to make major advances in lunar, Mars, and satellite programs, positioning itself as a potential successor to U.S. dominance in space.

As critics point out, the implications of these cuts go far beyond internal staffing changes. They strike at the heart of America’s scientific leadership, its future in space exploration, and its ability to inspire a new generation of thinkers and problem solvers.

If the administration follows through with these reductions, the question isn’t just how NASA adapts, but whether the U.S. is ready to accept a diminished role in one of humanity’s most inspiring frontiers.